Rust advisories / crate
Security history · nimiq-primitives · data from Oct 24, 2026
Is nimiq-primitives safe to use? Its security history
VerdictNo open advisories. 5 past vulnerabilities were fixed.
5advisories on record
5vulnerabilities
0unmaintained notices
nonenewest fixed version
Every advisory, newest first
- VulnerabilityGHSA-5rg2-xv9j-gv5p · 2026-07-16nimiq-primitives: Out-of-bounds panic in KeyNibbles::Add from oversized child suffix in a deserialized proof
- VulnerabilityGHSA-46wq-28cx-mhw4 · 2026-07-16nimiq-primitives: Panic in TrieProof::verify via child_index unwrap on equal-length keys
- VulnerabilityGHSA-mw3q-r9wh-h2ff · 2026-05-21nimiq-primitives: Panic DoS in trie chunk processing via ROOT-keyed item
- VulnerabilityGHSA-799f-29jm-gr6c · 2026-05-21nimiq-primitives: BlockInclusionProof interlink issue when hops are empty
- VulnerabilityGHSA-7c4j-2m43-2mgh · 2026-04-22nimiq-primitives: Node crash due to missing interlink validation in election macro block proposals
Check your version
Run cargo tree -i nimiq-primitives to see which version you build and why, or paste your Cargo.lock into the Cargo.toml checker to match every advisory against your exact versions.
RustSec advisories (CC0-1.0) and GitHub-reviewed advisories via OSV's crates.io export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026.
Up next
Are you affected?Check your whole dependency treeRead it next →Also worth your time
Did this answer your question?