Rust advisories / conqueue
Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2020-0117 · conqueue
RUSTSEC-2020-0117: QueueSender<T>/QueueReceiver<T>: Send/Sync impls need `T: Send`
Short answerA security vulnerability in the conqueue crate: QueueSender<T>/QueueReceiver<T>: Send/Sync impls need `T: Send`. High severity (CVSS 8.1). Fixed in 0.4.0: update to a fixed version.
| Crate | conqueue |
|---|---|
| Type | Vulnerability (memory-corruption, thread-safety) |
| Affected versions | Before 0.4.0. |
| Fixed in | 0.4.0 |
| Severity | High, CVSS 8.1 CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H |
| Published | 2020-11-24 |
| Last changed | 2023-11-08 |
| Also known as | CVE-2020-36437, GHSA-368f-29c3-4f2r |
What to do
- See which version you have:
cargo tree -i conqueue(it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in). - Update within your version requirement:
cargo update -p conqueue. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for exampleconqueue = "0.4.0") or update the dependency that pulls it in. - Check again with
cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.
Details from the advisory
Affected versions of this crate unconditionally implemented Send/Sync for QueueSender<T>, allowing to send non-Send T to other threads by invoking (&QueueSender<T>).send().
This fails to prevent users from creating data races by sending types like Rc<T> or Arc<Cell<T>> to other threads, which can lead to memory corruption.
The flaw was corrected in commit 1e462c3 by imposing T: Send to both Send/Sync impls for QueueSender<T>/QueueReceiver<T>.
References
- Package: crates.io/crates/conqueue
- Advisory: rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2020-0117.html
- Report: github.com/longshorej/conqueue/issues/9
From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.
Up next
Are you affected?Check your whole dependency treePaste Cargo.lock: every advisory, for your exact versions.Read it next →Also worth your time
Did this answer your question?