Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2022-0059 · openssl-src
RUSTSEC-2022-0059: Using a Custom Cipher with `NID_undef` may lead to NULL encryption
Short answerA security vulnerability in the openssl-src crate: Using a Custom Cipher with `NID_undef` may lead to NULL encryption. GitHub rates it High. Fixed in 300.0.10: update to a fixed version.
| Crate | openssl-src |
|---|---|
| Type | Vulnerability (crypto-failure) |
| Affected versions | From 300.0.0 before 300.0.10. |
| Fixed in | 300.0.10 |
| Severity | High (GitHub rating) |
| Published | 2022-10-11 |
| Last changed | 2023-11-08 |
| Also known as | CVE-2022-3358, GHSA-4f63-89w9-3jjv |
What to do
- See which version you have:
cargo tree -i openssl-src(it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in). - Update within your version requirement:
cargo update -p openssl-src. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for exampleopenssl-src = "300.0.10") or update the dependency that pulls it in. - Check again with
cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.
Details from the advisory
OpenSSL supports creating a custom cipher via the legacy EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() function and associated function calls. This function was deprecated in OpenSSL 3.0 and application authors are instead encouraged to use the new provider mechanism in order to implement custom ciphers.
OpenSSL versions 3.0.0 to 3.0.5 incorrectly handle legacy custom ciphers passed to the EVP_EncryptInit_ex2(), EVP_DecryptInit_ex2() and EVP_CipherInit_ex2() functions (as well as other similarly named encryption and decryption initialisation functions). Instead of using the custom cipher directly it incorrectly tries to fetch an equivalent cipher from the available providers. An equivalent cipher is found based on the NID passed to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). This NID is supposed to represent the unique NID for a given cipher. However it is possible for an application to incorrectly pass NID_undef as this value in the call to EVP_CIPHER_meth_new(). When NID_undef is used in this way the OpenSSL encryption/decryption initialisation function will match the NULL cipher as being equivalent and will fetch this from the available providers. This will succeed if the default provider has been loaded (or if a third party provider has been loaded that offers this cipher). Using the NULL cipher means that the plaintext is emitted as the ciphertext.
Applications are only affected by this issue if they call EVP_CIPHER_meth_new() using NID_undef and subsequently use it in a call to an encryption/decryption initialisation function. Applications that only use SSL/TLS are not impacted by this issue.
References
- Package: crates.io/crates/openssl-src
- Advisory: rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2022-0059.html
- Web: www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20221011.txt
From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.
Other advisories for openssl-src
- Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2020-0015 · 2020-04-25Crash causing Denial of Service attack
- Vulnerability MediumRUSTSEC-2021-0055 · 2021-05-01NULL pointer deref in signature_algorithms processing
- Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2021-0056 · 2021-05-01CA certificate check bypass with X509_V_FLAG_X509_STRICT
- Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2021-0057 · 2021-05-01Integer overflow in CipherUpdate
- Vulnerability MediumRUSTSEC-2021-0058 · 2021-05-01Null pointer deref in `X509_issuer_and_serial_hash()`
- Vulnerability CriticalRUSTSEC-2021-0097 · 2021-08-24SM2 Decryption Buffer Overflow
- Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2021-0098 · 2021-08-24Read buffer overruns processing ASN.1 strings
- VulnerabilityRUSTSEC-2021-0129 · 2021-12-14Invalid handling of `X509_verify_cert()` internal errors in libssl
Up next
Same crateopenssl-src: security historyEvery advisory for this crate, and whether it is safe to use today.Read it next →Did this answer your question?