Email me

Rust advisories / openssl-src

Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2023-0010 · openssl-src

RUSTSEC-2023-0010: Double free after calling `PEM_read_bio_ex`

Short answerA security vulnerability in the openssl-src crate: Double free after calling `PEM_read_bio_ex`. GitHub rates it High. Fixed in 111.25.0, 300.0.12: update to a fixed version.

Crateopenssl-src
TypeVulnerability (denial-of-service)
Affected versionsBefore 111.25.0; from 300.0.0 before 300.0.12.
Fixed in111.25.0, 300.0.12
SeverityHigh (GitHub rating)
Published2023-02-07
Last changed2023-11-08
Also known asCVE-2022-4450, GHSA-v5w6-wcm8-jm4q

What to do

  1. See which version you have: cargo tree -i openssl-src (it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in).
  2. Update within your version requirement: cargo update -p openssl-src. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for example openssl-src = "300.0.12") or update the dependency that pulls it in.
  3. Check again with cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.

Details from the advisory

The function PEM_read_bio_ex() reads a PEM file from a BIO and parses and decodes the "name" (e.g. "CERTIFICATE"), any header data and the payload data. If the function succeeds then the "name_out", "header" and "data" arguments are populated with pointers to buffers containing the relevant decoded data. The caller is responsible for freeing those buffers. It is possible to construct a PEM file that results in 0 bytes of payload data. In this case PEM_read_bio_ex() will return a failure code but will populate the header argument with a pointer to a buffer that has already been freed. If the caller also frees this buffer then a double free will occur. This will most likely lead to a crash. This could be exploited by an attacker who has the ability to supply malicious PEM files for parsing to achieve a denial of service attack.

The functions PEM_read_bio() and PEM_read() are simple wrappers around PEM_read_bio_ex() and therefore these functions are also directly affected.

These functions are also called indirectly by a number of other OpenSSL functions including PEM_X509_INFO_read_bio_ex() and SSL_CTX_use_serverinfo_file() which are also vulnerable. Some OpenSSL internal uses of these functions are not vulnerable because the caller does not free the header argument if PEM_read_bio_ex() returns a failure code. These locations include the PEM_read_bio_TYPE() functions as well as the decoders introduced in OpenSSL 3.0.

References

From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.

Other advisories for openssl-src

Full security history of openssl-src

Up next

Same crateopenssl-src: security historyEvery advisory for this crate, and whether it is safe to use today.Read it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ