Clippy lints / Pedantic
Clippy lint · Pedantic · checked with Clippy 0.1.99
clippy::items_after_statements: adding items after statements is confusing, since items exist from the start of the scope
What it meansChecks for items declared after some statement in a block. It is in the pedantic group and off by default.
What you see
warning: adding items after statements is confusing, since items exist from the start of the scope --> main.rs:7:5 | 7 | / fn foo() { 8 | | println!("foo"); 9 | | } | |_____^ | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#items_after_statements = note: `-W clippy::items-after-statements` implied by `-W clippy::pedantic`
Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.
Does it matter?
Items live for the entire scope they are declared in. But statements are processed in order. This might cause confusion as it’s hard to figure out which item is meant in a statement.
Stricter lints with some false positives. Off by default; opt in with clippy::pedantic.
How to fix it
Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:
Flagged
fn foo() {
println!("cake");
}
fn main() {
foo(); // prints "foo"
fn foo() {
println!("foo");
}
foo(); // prints "foo"
}
Write this instead
fn foo() {
println!("cake");
}
fn main() {
fn foo() {
println!("foo");
}
foo(); // prints "foo"
foo(); // prints "foo"
}
Turn it off, or on
It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:
Whole crate (Cargo.toml)
[lints.clippy]
items_after_statements = "warn"In code
#![warn(clippy::items_after_statements)]One run
cargo clippy -- -W clippy::items-after-statementsThe [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.
Clippy's own documentation
What it does
Checks for items declared after some statement in a block.
Why is this bad?
Items live for the entire scope they are declared in. But statements are processed in order. This might cause confusion as it’s hard to figure out which item is meant in a statement.
Example
fn foo() {
println!("cake");
}
fn main() {
foo(); // prints "foo"
fn foo() {
println!("foo");
}
foo(); // prints "foo"
}
Use instead:
fn foo() {
println!("cake");
}
fn main() {
fn foo() {
println!("foo");
}
foo(); // prints "foo"
foo(); // prints "foo"
}
From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.
Related lints
- too_many_linesChecks for functions with a large amount of lines
- missing_errors_docChecks the doc comments of publicly visible functions that return a Result type and warns if there is no # Errors section
- must_use_candidateChecks for public functions that have no #[must_use] attribute, but return something not already marked must-use, have no mutable arg and mutate no statics
- into_iter_without_iterThis is the opposite of the iter_without_into_iter lint. It looks for IntoIterator for (&|&mut) Type implementations without an inherent iter or iter_mut method on the type or on any of the types in its Deref chain
- invalid_upcast_comparisonsbecause of the numeric bounds on `x` prior to casting, this expression is always false
- ip_constanthand-coded well-known IP address
- iter_filter_is_ok`filter` for `is_ok` on iterator over `Result`s
- iter_filter_is_some`filter` for `is_some` on iterator over `Option`
- iter_not_returning_iteratorthis method is named `iter` but its return type does not implement `Iterator`
All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker
Up next
Related lintclippy::too_many_linesChecks for functions with a large amount of linesRead it next →Did this answer your question?