Clippy lints / Pedantic
Clippy lint · Pedantic · checked with Clippy 0.1.99
clippy::iter_without_into_iter: Looks for iter and iter_mut methods without an associated IntoIterator for (&|&mut) Type implementation
What it meansLooks for iter and iter_mut methods without an associated IntoIterator for (&|&mut) Type implementation. It is in the pedantic group and off by default.
Does it matter?
It’s not bad, but having them is idiomatic and allows the type to be used in for loops directly (for val in &iter {}), without having to first call iter() or iter_mut().
Stricter lints with some false positives. Off by default; opt in with clippy::pedantic.
How to fix it
Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:
Flagged
struct MySlice<'a>(&'a [u8]);
impl<'a> MySlice<'a> {
pub fn iter(&self) -> std::slice::Iter<'a, u8> {
self.0.iter()
}
}
Write this instead
struct MySlice<'a>(&'a [u8]);
impl<'a> MySlice<'a> {
pub fn iter(&self) -> std::slice::Iter<'a, u8> {
self.0.iter()
}
}
impl<'a> IntoIterator for &MySlice<'a> {
type Item = &'a u8;
type IntoIter = std::slice::Iter<'a, u8>;
fn into_iter(self) -> Self::IntoIter {
self.iter()
}
}
Turn it off, or on
It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:
Whole crate (Cargo.toml)
[lints.clippy]
iter_without_into_iter = "warn"In code
#![warn(clippy::iter_without_into_iter)]One run
cargo clippy -- -W clippy::iter-without-into-iterThe [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.
Clippy's own documentation
What it does
Looks for iter and iter_mut methods without an associated IntoIterator for (&|&mut) Type implementation.
Why is this bad?
It’s not bad, but having them is idiomatic and allows the type to be used in for loops directly
(for val in &iter {}), without having to first call iter() or iter_mut().
Limitations
This lint focuses on providing an idiomatic API. Therefore, it will only
lint on types which are accessible outside of the crate. For internal types,
the IntoIterator trait can be implemented on demand if it is actually needed.
Example
struct MySlice<'a>(&'a [u8]);
impl<'a> MySlice<'a> {
pub fn iter(&self) -> std::slice::Iter<'a, u8> {
self.0.iter()
}
}
Use instead:
struct MySlice<'a>(&'a [u8]);
impl<'a> MySlice<'a> {
pub fn iter(&self) -> std::slice::Iter<'a, u8> {
self.0.iter()
}
}
impl<'a> IntoIterator for &MySlice<'a> {
type Item = &'a u8;
type IntoIter = std::slice::Iter<'a, u8>;
fn into_iter(self) -> Self::IntoIter {
self.iter()
}
}
From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.
Related lints
- too_many_linesChecks for functions with a large amount of lines
- missing_errors_docChecks the doc comments of publicly visible functions that return a Result type and warns if there is no # Errors section
- must_use_candidateChecks for public functions that have no #[must_use] attribute, but return something not already marked must-use, have no mutable arg and mutate no statics
- iter_filter_is_ok`filter` for `is_ok` on iterator over `Result`s
- iter_filter_is_some`filter` for `is_some` on iterator over `Option`
- iter_not_returning_iteratorthis method is named `iter` but its return type does not implement `Iterator`
- large_digit_groupsdigit groups should be smaller
- large_futureslarge future with a size of 16385 bytes
- large_stack_arraysallocating a local array larger than 16384 bytes
All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker
Up next
Related lintclippy::too_many_linesChecks for functions with a large amount of linesRead it next →Did this answer your question?