Clippy lints / Performance
Clippy lint · Performance · checked with Clippy 0.1.99
clippy::missing_spin_loop: busy-waiting loop should at least have a spin loop hint
What it meansChecks for empty spin loops It is in the performance group and warns by default.
What you see
warning: busy-waiting loop should at least have a spin loop hint --> main.rs:6:33 | 6 | while b.load(Ordering::Acquire) {}; | ^^ help: try: `{ std::hint::spin_loop() }` | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#missing_spin_loop = note: `#[warn(clippy::missing_spin_loop)]` on by default
Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.
Does it matter?
The loop body should have something like thread::park() or at least std::hint::spin_loop() to avoid needlessly burning cycles and conserve energy. Perhaps even better use an actual lock, if possible.
Code that could be written to run faster. Warns by default.
How to fix it
Clippy can fix this one for you: run cargo clippy --fix (add --allow-dirty if you have uncommitted changes). Review the diff before you commit.
Flagged
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering};
let b = AtomicBool::new(true);
// give a ref to `b` to another thread,wait for it to become false
while b.load(Ordering::Acquire) {};
Write this instead
while b.load(Ordering::Acquire) {
std::hint::spin_loop()
}
Turn it off, or on
Allow it where it does not fit your code, as narrowly as you can:
On one item
#[allow(clippy::missing_spin_loop)]
fn my_function() { /* ... */ }Whole crate (Cargo.toml)
[lints.clippy]
missing_spin_loop = "allow"One run
cargo clippy -- -A clippy::missing-spin-loopThe [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.
Clippy's own documentation
What it does
Checks for empty spin loops
Why is this bad?
The loop body should have something like thread::park() or at least
std::hint::spin_loop() to avoid needlessly burning cycles and conserve
energy. Perhaps even better use an actual lock, if possible.
Known problems
This lint doesn’t currently trigger on while let or
loop { match .. { .. } } loops, which would be considered idiomatic in
combination with e.g. AtomicBool::compare_exchange_weak.
Example
use core::sync::atomic::{AtomicBool, Ordering};
let b = AtomicBool::new(true);
// give a ref to `b` to another thread,wait for it to become false
while b.load(Ordering::Acquire) {};
Use instead:
while b.load(Ordering::Acquire) {
std::hint::spin_loop()
}
From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.
Related lints
- large_enum_variantlarge size difference between variants
- manual_try_foldusage of `Iterator::fold` on a type that implements `Try`
- map_entryusage of `contains_key` followed by `insert` on a `HashMap`
- missing_const_for_thread_localinitializer for `thread_local` value can be made `const`
- readonly_write_lockthis write lock is used only for reading
- redundant_allocationChecks for usage of redundant allocations anywhere in the code
- redundant_iter_clonedunneeded cloning of iterator items
All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker
Up next
Related lintclippy::large_enum_variantlarge size difference between variantsRead it next →Did this answer your question?