Clippy lints / Suspicious
Clippy lint · Suspicious · checked with Clippy 0.1.99
clippy::repr_packed_without_abi: item uses `packed` representation without ABI-qualification
What it meansChecks for items with #[repr(packed)]-attribute without ABI qualification It is in the suspicious group and warns by default.
What you see
warning: item uses `packed` representation without ABI-qualification --> main.rs:4:1 | 3 | #[repr(packed)] | ------ `packed` representation set here 4 | / struct NetworkPacketHeader { 5 | | header_length: u8, 6 | | header_version: u16 7 | | } | |_^ | = warning: unqualified `#[repr(packed)]` defaults to `#[repr(Rust, packed)]`, which has no stable ABI = help: qualify the desired ABI explicitly via `#[repr(C, packed)]` or `#[repr(Rust, packed)]` = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#repr_packed_without_abi = note: `#[warn(clippy::repr_packed_without_abi)]` on by default
Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.
Does it matter?
Without qualification, repr(packed) implies repr(Rust). The Rust-ABI is inherently unstable. While this is fine as long as the type is accessed correctly within Rust-code, most uses of #[repr(packed)] involve FFI and/or data structures specified by network-protocols or other external specifications. In such situations, the unstable Rust-ABI implied in #[repr(packed)] may lead to future bugs should the Rust-ABI change. In case you are relying on a well defined and stable memory layout, qualify the type’s representation using the C-ABI. Otherwise, if the type in question is only ever accessed from Rust-code according to Rust’s rules, use the Rust-ABI explicitly.
Code that is most likely wrong or useless. Warns by default.
How to fix it
Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:
Flagged
#[repr(packed)]
struct NetworkPacketHeader {
header_length: u8,
header_version: u16
}
Write this instead
#[repr(C, packed)]
struct NetworkPacketHeader {
header_length: u8,
header_version: u16
}
Turn it off, or on
Allow it where it does not fit your code, as narrowly as you can:
On one item
#[allow(clippy::repr_packed_without_abi)]
fn my_function() { /* ... */ }Whole crate (Cargo.toml)
[lints.clippy]
repr_packed_without_abi = "allow"One run
cargo clippy -- -A clippy::repr-packed-without-abiThe [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.
Clippy's own documentation
What it does
Checks for items with #[repr(packed)]-attribute without ABI qualification
Why is this bad?
Without qualification, repr(packed) implies repr(Rust). The Rust-ABI is inherently unstable.
While this is fine as long as the type is accessed correctly within Rust-code, most uses
of #[repr(packed)] involve FFI and/or data structures specified by network-protocols or
other external specifications. In such situations, the unstable Rust-ABI implied in
#[repr(packed)] may lead to future bugs should the Rust-ABI change.
In case you are relying on a well defined and stable memory layout, qualify the type’s
representation using the C-ABI. Otherwise, if the type in question is only ever
accessed from Rust-code according to Rust’s rules, use the Rust-ABI explicitly.
Example
#[repr(packed)]
struct NetworkPacketHeader {
header_length: u8,
header_version: u16
}
Use instead:
#[repr(C, packed)]
struct NetworkPacketHeader {
header_length: u8,
header_version: u16
}
From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.
Related lints
- rc_clone_in_vec_initinitializing a reference-counted pointer in `vec![elem; len]`
- redundant_localsredundant redefinition of a binding `a`
- repeat_vec_with_capacityLooks for patterns such as vec![Vec::with_capacity(x); n] or iter::repeat(Vec::with_capacity(x))
- single_range_in_vec_initan array of `Range` that is only one element
- size_of_refargument to `size_of_val()` is a reference to a reference
- suspicious_arithmetic_implLints for suspicious operations in impls of arithmetic operators, e.g. subtracting elements in an Add impl
All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker
Up next
Related lintclippy::rc_clone_in_vec_initinitializing a reference-counted pointer in `vec![elem; len]`Read it next →Did this answer your question?