Email me

Clippy lints / Pedantic

Clippy lint · Pedantic · checked with Clippy 0.1.99

clippy::semicolon_if_nothing_returned: consider adding a `;` to the last statement for consistent formatting

What it meansLooks for blocks of expressions and fires if the last expression returns () but is not followed by a semicolon. It is in the pedantic group and off by default.

What you see

warning: consider adding a `;` to the last statement for consistent formatting
 --> main.rs:2:5
  |
2 |     println!("Hello world")
  |     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ help: add a `;` here: `println!("Hello world");`
  |
  = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#semicolon_if_nothing_returned
  = note: `-W clippy::semicolon-if-nothing-returned` implied by `-W clippy::pedantic`

Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.

Does it matter?

The semicolon might be optional but when extending the block with new code, it doesn’t require a change in previous last line.

Stricter lints with some false positives. Off by default; opt in with clippy::pedantic.

How to fix it

Clippy can fix this one for you: run cargo clippy --fix (add --allow-dirty if you have uncommitted changes). Review the diff before you commit.

Flagged

fn main() {
    println!("Hello world")
}

Write this instead

fn main() {
    println!("Hello world");
}

Turn it off, or on

It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:

Whole crate (Cargo.toml)

[lints.clippy]
semicolon_if_nothing_returned = "warn"

In code

#![warn(clippy::semicolon_if_nothing_returned)]

One run

cargo clippy -- -W clippy::semicolon-if-nothing-returned

The [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.

Pedanticgroup
allowdefault level
yesfixed by cargo clippy --fix
1.52.0added in Rust

Clippy's own documentation

What it does

Looks for blocks of expressions and fires if the last expression returns () but is not followed by a semicolon.

Why is this bad?

The semicolon might be optional but when extending the block with new code, it doesn’t require a change in previous last line.

Example

fn main() {
    println!("Hello world")
}

Use instead:

fn main() {
    println!("Hello world");
}

From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.

Related lints

All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker

Up next

Related lintclippy::too_many_linesChecks for functions with a large amount of linesRead it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ