Email me

Clippy lints / Nursery

Clippy lint · Nursery · checked with Clippy 0.1.99

clippy::set_contains_or_insert: usage of `HashSet::insert` after `HashSet::contains`

What it meansChecks for usage of contains to see if a value is not present in a set like HashSet or BTreeSet, followed by an insert. It is in the nursery group and off by default.

What you see

warning: usage of `HashSet::insert` after `HashSet::contains`
 --> main.rs:6:9
  |
6 | if !set.contains(&value) {
  |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
7 |     set.insert(value);
  |         ^^^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
  = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#set_contains_or_insert
  = note: `-W clippy::set-contains-or-insert` implied by `-W clippy::nursery`

Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.

Does it matter?

Using just insert and checking the returned bool is more efficient.

New lints still being finished. Off by default and may have false positives.

How to fix it

Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:

Flagged

use std::collections::HashSet;
let mut set = HashSet::new();
let value = 5;
if !set.contains(&value) {
    set.insert(value);
    println!("inserted {value:?}");
}

Write this instead

use std::collections::HashSet;
let mut set = HashSet::new();
let value = 5;
if set.insert(&value) {
    println!("inserted {value:?}");
}

Turn it off, or on

It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:

Whole crate (Cargo.toml)

[lints.clippy]
set_contains_or_insert = "warn"

In code

#![warn(clippy::set_contains_or_insert)]

One run

cargo clippy -- -W clippy::set-contains-or-insert

The [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.

Nurserygroup
allowdefault level
nofixed by cargo clippy --fix
1.81.0added in Rust

Clippy's own documentation

What it does

Checks for usage of contains to see if a value is not present in a set like HashSet or BTreeSet, followed by an insert.

Why is this bad?

Using just insert and checking the returned bool is more efficient.

Known problems

In case the value that wants to be inserted is borrowed and also expensive or impossible to clone. In such a scenario, the developer might want to check with contains before inserting, to avoid the clone. In this case, it will report a false positive.

Example

use std::collections::HashSet;
let mut set = HashSet::new();
let value = 5;
if !set.contains(&value) {
    set.insert(value);
    println!("inserted {value:?}");
}

Use instead:

use std::collections::HashSet;
let mut set = HashSet::new();
let value = 5;
if set.insert(&value) {
    println!("inserted {value:?}");
}

From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.

Related lints

All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker

Up next

Related lintclippy::redundant_cloneChecks for a redundant clone() (and its relatives) which clones an owned value that is going to be dropped without further useRead it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ