Clippy lints / Restriction
Clippy lint · Restriction · checked with Clippy 0.1.99
clippy::single_char_lifetime_names: single-character lifetime names are likely uninformative
What it meansChecks for lifetimes with names which are one character long. It is in the restriction group and off by default.
What you see
warning: single-character lifetime names are likely uninformative --> main.rs:3:22 | 3 | struct DiagnosticCtx<'a> { | ^^ | = help: use a more informative name = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#single_char_lifetime_names = note: requested on the command line with `-W clippy::single-char-lifetime-names`
Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.
Does it matter?
A single character is likely not enough to express the purpose of a lifetime. Using a longer name can make code easier to understand.
Lints that forbid language features for specific codebases (no unwrap, no indexing...). Off by default; pick them one by one, never the whole group.
How to fix it
Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:
Flagged
struct DiagnosticCtx<'a> {
source: &'a str,
}
Write this instead
struct DiagnosticCtx<'src> {
source: &'src str,
}
Turn it off, or on
It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:
Whole crate (Cargo.toml)
[lints.clippy]
single_char_lifetime_names = "warn"In code
#![warn(clippy::single_char_lifetime_names)]One run
cargo clippy -- -W clippy::single-char-lifetime-namesThe [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.
Clippy's own documentation
What it does
Checks for lifetimes with names which are one character long.
Why restrict this?
A single character is likely not enough to express the purpose of a lifetime. Using a longer name can make code easier to understand.
Known problems
Rust programmers and learning resources tend to use single character lifetimes, so this lint is at odds with the ecosystem at large. In addition, the lifetime’s purpose may be obvious or, rarely, expressible in one character.
Example
struct DiagnosticCtx<'a> {
source: &'a str,
}
Use instead:
struct DiagnosticCtx<'src> {
source: &'src str,
}
From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.
Related lints
- unwrap_usedChecks for .unwrap() or .unwrap_err() calls on Results and .unwrap() call on Options
- module_name_repetitionsDetects public item names that are prefixed or suffixed by the containing public module’s name
- expect_usedChecks for .expect() or .expect_err() calls on Results and .expect() call on Options
- shadow_sameChecks for bindings that shadow other bindings already in scope, while just changing reference level or mutability
- shadow_unrelatedChecks for bindings that shadow other bindings already in scope, either without an initialization or with one that does not even use the original value
- single_call_fnthis function is only used once
- std_instead_of_allocused import from `std` instead of `alloc`
- std_instead_of_coreused import from `std` instead of `core`
- str_to_string`to_string()` called on a `&str`
All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker
Up next
Related lintclippy::unwrap_usedChecks for .unwrap() or .unwrap_err() calls on Results and .unwrap() call on OptionsRead it next →Did this answer your question?