Clippy lints / Nursery
Clippy lint · Nursery · checked with Clippy 0.1.99
clippy::volatile_composites: type `main::MyDevice` is not volatile-compatible
What it meansThis lint warns when volatile load/store operations (write_volatile/read_volatile) are applied to composite types. It is in the nursery group and off by default.
What you see
warning: type `main::MyDevice` is not volatile-compatible --> main.rs:10:9 | 10 | device.write_volatile(MyDevice { addr, count }); | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ | = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#volatile_composites = note: `-W clippy::volatile-composites` implied by `-W clippy::nursery`
Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.
Does it matter?
Volatile operations are typically used with memory mapped IO devices, where the precise number and ordering of load and store instructions is important because they can have side effects. This is well defined for primitive types like u32, but less well defined for structures and other composite types. In practice it’s implementation defined, and the behavior can be rustc-version dependent. As a result, code should only apply write_volatile/read_volatile to primitive types to be fully well-defined.
New lints still being finished. Off by default and may have false positives.
How to fix it
Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:
Flagged
struct MyDevice {
addr: usize,
count: usize
}
fn start_device(device: *mut MyDevice, addr: usize, count: usize) {
unsafe {
device.write_volatile(MyDevice { addr, count });
}
}
Write this instead
struct MyDevice {
addr: usize,
count: usize
}
fn start_device(device: *mut MyDevice, addr: usize, count: usize) {
unsafe {
(&raw mut (*device).addr).write_volatile(addr);
(&raw mut (*device).count).write_volatile(count);
}
}
Turn it off, or on
It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:
Whole crate (Cargo.toml)
[lints.clippy]
volatile_composites = "warn"In code
#![warn(clippy::volatile_composites)]One run
cargo clippy -- -W clippy::volatile-compositesThe [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.
Clippy's own documentation
What it does
This lint warns when volatile load/store operations
(write_volatile/read_volatile) are applied to composite types.
Why is this bad?
Volatile operations are typically used with memory mapped IO devices,
where the precise number and ordering of load and store instructions is
important because they can have side effects. This is well defined for
primitive types like u32, but less well defined for structures and
other composite types. In practice it’s implementation defined, and the
behavior can be rustc-version dependent.
As a result, code should only apply write_volatile/read_volatile to
primitive types to be fully well-defined.
Example
struct MyDevice {
addr: usize,
count: usize
}
fn start_device(device: *mut MyDevice, addr: usize, count: usize) {
unsafe {
device.write_volatile(MyDevice { addr, count });
}
}
Instead, operate on each primtive field individually:
struct MyDevice {
addr: usize,
count: usize
}
fn start_device(device: *mut MyDevice, addr: usize, count: usize) {
unsafe {
(&raw mut (*device).addr).write_volatile(addr);
(&raw mut (*device).count).write_volatile(count);
}
}
From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.
Related lints
- redundant_cloneChecks for a redundant clone() (and its relatives) which clones an owned value that is going to be dropped without further use
- unused_roundingused the `ceil` method with a whole number float
- use_selfunnecessary structure name repetition
- useless_let_if_seqChecks for variable declarations immediately followed by a conditional affectation
- while_floatwhile condition comparing floats
All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker
Up next
Related lintclippy::redundant_cloneChecks for a redundant clone() (and its relatives) which clones an owned value that is going to be dropped without further useRead it next →Did this answer your question?