Email me

Rust advisories / ckb

Vulnerability CriticalRUSTSEC-2021-0107 · ckb

RUSTSEC-2021-0107: Miner fails to get block template when a cell used as a cell dep has been destroyed.

Short answerA security vulnerability in the ckb crate: Miner fails to get block template when a cell used as a cell dep has been destroyed.. GitHub rates it Critical. Fixed in 0.40.0: update to a fixed version.

Crateckb
TypeVulnerability
Affected versionsBefore 0.40.0.
Fixed in0.40.0
SeverityCritical (GitHub rating)
Published2021-07-25
Last changed2026-10-12
Also known asCVE-2021-45698, GHSA-8gjm-h3xj-mp6w, GHSA-v666-6w97-pcwm

What to do

  1. See which version you have: cargo tree -i ckb (it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in).
  2. Update within your version requirement: cargo update -p ckb. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for example ckb = "0.40.0") or update the dependency that pulls it in.
  3. Check again with cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.

Details from the advisory

Impact

The RPC get_block_template fails when a cell has been used as a cell dep and an input in the different transactions.

Say cell C is used as a dep group in the transaction A, and is destroyed in the transaction B.

The node adds transaction A first, then B into the transaction pool. They are both valid. But when generating the block template, if the fee rate of B is higher, it comes before A, which will invalidate A. Currently the RPC get_block_template will fail instead of dropping A.

Patch

First, the get_block_template should not fail but dropping the conflict transactions.

Then we can propose solution to this issue. Here is an example. When a transaction is added to the pool, the pool must consider it depending on all the transactions which dep cell (direct or indirect via dep group) has been destroyed in this transaction. Because future transactions using the destroyed cells as dep will be rejected, the spending transaction only need to wait for all the existing dep transactions on chain.

Workaround

Submit transaction B when A is already on chain. Let B depend on A explicitly, there are several solutions: a. Add any output cell on A as a dep cell or input in B. b. Merge A and B. CKB allows using the same cell as both dep and input in the same transaction. Ensure the fee rate of B is less than A so A always has higher priority.

References

From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.

Other advisories for ckb

Full security history of ckb

Up next

Same crateckb: security historyEvery advisory for this crate, and whether it is safe to use today.Read it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ