Vulnerability CriticalRUSTSEC-2025-0129 · cggmp21
RUSTSEC-2025-0129: Missing check in ZK proof in CGGMP21 Threshold Signing Protocol
Short answerA security vulnerability in the cggmp21 crate: Missing check in ZK proof in CGGMP21 Threshold Signing Protocol. GitHub rates it Critical. Fixed in 0.6.3: update to a fixed version.
| Crate | cggmp21 |
|---|---|
| Type | Vulnerability (crypto-failure) |
| Affected versions | Before 0.6.3. |
| Fixed in | 0.6.3 |
| Severity | Critical (GitHub rating) |
| Published | 2025-11-24 |
| Last changed | 2025-11-26 |
| Also known as | CVE-2025-66016, GHSA-m95p-425x-x889, RUSTSEC-2025-0130 |
What to do
- See which version you have:
cargo tree -i cggmp21(it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in). - Update within your version requirement:
cargo update -p cggmp21. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for examplecggmp21 = "0.6.3") or update the dependency that pulls it in. - Check again with
cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.
Details from the advisory
Vulnerability concerns a missing check in the ZK proof that enables an attack in which single malicious signer can reconstruct full private key.
Patches
cggmp21 v0.6.3is a patch release that contains a fix that introduces this specific missing check.- However, we recommend upgrading to
cggmp24 v0.7.0-alpha.2in which we've introduced many other security checks as a precaution. Follow the migration guidelines to upgrade.
References
Read our blog post to learn more.
References
- Package: crates.io/crates/cggmp21
- Advisory: rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2025-0129.html
- Web: www.dfns.co/article/cggmp21-vulnerabilities-patched-and-explained
From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.
Other advisories for cggmp21
Up next
Same cratecggmp21: security historyEvery advisory for this crate, and whether it is safe to use today.Read it next →Did this answer your question?