Email me

Rust advisories / bcrypt

Vulnerability MediumRUSTSEC-2026-0199 · bcrypt

RUSTSEC-2026-0199: Panic in `bcrypt::verify` on non-ASCII hash input

Short answerA security vulnerability in the bcrypt crate: Panic in `bcrypt::verify` on non-ASCII hash input. Medium severity (CVSS 5.3). Fixed in 0.19.2: update to a fixed version.

Cratebcrypt
TypeVulnerability (denial-of-service)
Affected versionsFrom 0.19.0 before 0.19.2.
Fixed in0.19.2
SeverityMedium, CVSS 5.3
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Published2026-06-20
Last changed2026-07-04
Also known asnone

What to do

  1. See which version you have: cargo tree -i bcrypt (it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in).
  2. Update within your version requirement: cargo update -p bcrypt. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for example bcrypt = "0.19.2") or update the dependency that pulls it in.
  3. Check again with cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.

Details from the advisory

bcrypt::verify(password, hash) and HashParts::from_str(hash) panic in str::slice_error_fail when given a 60-byte &str containing a multi-byte UTF-8 character at certain byte positions.

Impact

Any Rust code that calls bcrypt::verify (or HashParts::from_str) with an attacker-controlled hash string will panic. The bcrypt crate is #![forbid(unsafe_code)], so this is limited to a denial-of-service and cannot lead to memory corruption.

Realistic attack contexts include:

  • Rust authentication services reading hashes from a database that was previously compromised via, e.g., SQL injection. The attacker can then crash the service on every login attempt against the tampered account.
  • CLI tools accepting hashes from stdin or command-line arguments.
  • Password managers or vault services loading hashes from untrusted configuration sources.

Root cause

split_hash performed five &str slicing operations on the input hash: &hash[1..3], &hash[4..6], &hash[7..], &salt_and_hash[..22], and &salt_and_hash[22..]. None of these were char-boundary-checked. Any input where a multi-byte UTF-8 character spanned one of those byte positions caused a panic.

This is a regression of the fix originally shipped in 2021 for issue #62 (commit 0833509). The regression was introduced in the parser rewrite in PR #95 (commit e9a8394, released as 0.19.0).

The pre-existing regression test does_no_error_on_char_boundary_splitting was not removed, but was silently rendered ineffective by the new bytes[0] != b'$' guard, which rejected its input earlier and prevented it from reaching the buggy slices , leaving CI green through the regression.

Fix

split_hash now rejects any hash string containing non-ASCII bytes up front. A valid bcrypt hash is always exactly 60 ASCII bytes, so this closes the entire class of byte-boundary panics rather than guarding each slice individually.

The fix was merged in PR #103 and released as bcrypt 0.19.2 on 2026-06-20.

Downstream impact

pyca/bcrypt (which depended on bcrypt 0.19.1) is **not** affected. Its Python-side wrapper performs its own byte-level salt parsing before invoking bcrypt::hash_with_salt, and never reaches the buggy code path in split_hash or verify.

References

From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.

Up next

Are you affected?Check your whole dependency treePaste Cargo.lock: every advisory, for your exact versions.Read it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ