Email me

Clippy lints / Restriction

Clippy lint · Restriction · checked with Clippy 0.1.99

clippy::pattern_type_mismatch: type of pattern does not match the expression type

What it meansChecks for patterns that aren’t exact representations of the types they are applied to. To satisfy this lint, you will have to adjust either the expression that is matched against or the pattern itself, as well as the bindings that are introduced by the adjusted patterns. For matching you will have to either dereference the expression with the * operator, or amend the patterns to explicitly match against &<pattern> or &mut <pattern> depending on the reference mutability. For the bindings you need to use the inverse. You can leave them as plain bindings if you wish for the value to be copied, but you must use ref mut <variable> or ref <variable> to construct a reference into the matched structure. If you are looking for a way to learn about ownership semantics in more detail, it is recommended to look at IDE options available to you to highlight types, lifetimes and reference semantics in your code. The available tooling would expose these things in a general way even outside of the various pattern matching mechanics. Of course this lint can still be used to highlight areas of interest and ensure a good understanding of ownership semantics. It is in the restriction group and off by default.

What you see

warning: type of pattern does not match the expression type
 --> main.rs:6:5
  |
6 |     Some(inner) => println!("{}", inner),
  |     ^^^^^^^^^^^
  |
  = help: use `*` to dereference the match expression or explicitly match against a `&_` pattern and adjust the enclosed variable bindings
  = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#pattern_type_mismatch
  = note: requested on the command line with `-W clippy::pattern-type-mismatch`

Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.

Does it matter?

It increases ownership hints in the code, and will guard against some changes in ownership.

Lints that forbid language features for specific codebases (no unwrap, no indexing...). Off by default; pick them one by one, never the whole group.

How to fix it

Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:

Flagged

// Bad
let value = &Some(Box::new(23));
match value {
    Some(inner) => println!("{}", inner),
    None => println!("none"),
}

// Good
let value = &Some(Box::new(23));
match *value {
    Some(ref inner) => println!("{}", inner),
    None => println!("none"),
}

Write this instead

// Bad
let mut values = vec![(2, 3), (3, 4)];
for (a, b) in &mut values {
    *a += *b;
}

// Good
let mut values = vec![(2, 3), (3, 4)];
for &mut (ref mut a, b) in &mut values {
    *a += b;
}

Turn it off, or on

It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:

Whole crate (Cargo.toml)

[lints.clippy]
pattern_type_mismatch = "warn"

In code

#![warn(clippy::pattern_type_mismatch)]

One run

cargo clippy -- -W clippy::pattern-type-mismatch

The [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.

Restrictiongroup
allowdefault level
nofixed by cargo clippy --fix
1.47.0added in Rust

Clippy's own documentation

What it does

Checks for patterns that aren’t exact representations of the types they are applied to.

To satisfy this lint, you will have to adjust either the expression that is matched against or the pattern itself, as well as the bindings that are introduced by the adjusted patterns. For matching you will have to either dereference the expression with the * operator, or amend the patterns to explicitly match against &<pattern> or &mut <pattern> depending on the reference mutability. For the bindings you need to use the inverse. You can leave them as plain bindings if you wish for the value to be copied, but you must use ref mut <variable> or ref <variable> to construct a reference into the matched structure.

If you are looking for a way to learn about ownership semantics in more detail, it is recommended to look at IDE options available to you to highlight types, lifetimes and reference semantics in your code. The available tooling would expose these things in a general way even outside of the various pattern matching mechanics. Of course this lint can still be used to highlight areas of interest and ensure a good understanding of ownership semantics.

Why restrict this?

It increases ownership hints in the code, and will guard against some changes in ownership.

Example

This example shows the basic adjustments necessary to satisfy the lint. Note how the matched expression is explicitly dereferenced with * and the inner variable is bound to a shared borrow via ref inner.

// Bad
let value = &Some(Box::new(23));
match value {
    Some(inner) => println!("{}", inner),
    None => println!("none"),
}

// Good
let value = &Some(Box::new(23));
match *value {
    Some(ref inner) => println!("{}", inner),
    None => println!("none"),
}

The following example demonstrates one of the advantages of the more verbose style. Note how the second version uses ref mut a to explicitly declare a a shared mutable borrow, while b is simply taken by value. This ensures that the loop body cannot accidentally modify the wrong part of the structure.

// Bad
let mut values = vec![(2, 3), (3, 4)];
for (a, b) in &mut values {
    *a += *b;
}

// Good
let mut values = vec![(2, 3), (3, 4)];
for &mut (ref mut a, b) in &mut values {
    *a += b;
}

From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.

Related lints

All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker

Up next

Related lintclippy::unwrap_usedChecks for .unwrap() or .unwrap_err() calls on Results and .unwrap() call on OptionsRead it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ