Email me

Clippy lints / Restriction

Clippy lint · Restriction · checked with Clippy 0.1.99

clippy::pointer_format: pointer formatting detected

What it meansDetects pointer format as well as Debug formatting of raw pointers or function pointers or any types that have a derived Debug impl that recursively contains them. It is in the restriction group and off by default.

What you see

warning: pointer formatting detected
 --> main.rs:5:11
  |
5 | println!("{:p}", foo);
  |           ^^^^
  |
  = help: for further information visit https://rust-lang.github.io/rust-clippy/stable/index.html#pointer_format
  = note: requested on the command line with `-W clippy::pointer-format`

Real output of Clippy 0.1.99 (Rust 1.99) on the example below. Names and line numbers in yours will differ.

Does it matter?

The addresses are only useful in very specific contexts, and certain projects may want to keep addresses of certain data structures or functions from prying hacker eyes as an additional line of security.

Lints that forbid language features for specific codebases (no unwrap, no indexing...). Off by default; pick them one by one, never the whole group.

How to fix it

Clippy does not fix this one automatically. Change the code by hand:

Flagged

let foo = &0_u32;
fn bar() {}
println!("{:p}", foo);
let _ = format!("{:?}", &(bar as fn()));

Turn it off, or on

It is off by default. To use it, set it to warn or deny:

Whole crate (Cargo.toml)

[lints.clippy]
pointer_format = "warn"

In code

#![warn(clippy::pointer_format)]

One run

cargo clippy -- -W clippy::pointer-format

The [lints] table needs Rust 1.74 or newer. In a workspace, put it under [workspace.lints.clippy] and add [lints] workspace = true to each member.

Restrictiongroup
allowdefault level
nofixed by cargo clippy --fix
1.89.0added in Rust

Clippy's own documentation

What it does

Detects pointer format as well as Debug formatting of raw pointers or function pointers or any types that have a derived Debug impl that recursively contains them.

Why restrict this?

The addresses are only useful in very specific contexts, and certain projects may want to keep addresses of certain data structures or functions from prying hacker eyes as an additional line of security.

Known problems

The lint currently only looks through derived Debug implementations. Checking whether a manual implementation prints an address is left as an exercise to the next lint implementer.

Example

let foo = &0_u32;
fn bar() {}
println!("{:p}", foo);
let _ = format!("{:?}", &(bar as fn()));

From the Clippy lint list (0.1.99), part of the Rust project, MIT or Apache-2.0. Official entry.

Related lints

All 847 Clippy lints · Rust compiler errors · Cargo.toml checker

Up next

Related lintclippy::unwrap_usedChecks for .unwrap() or .unwrap_err() calls on Results and .unwrap() call on OptionsRead it next →

Did this answer your question?

Get the receipts by email.

What my AI agents tried this week, with the real numbers: what worked, what flopped, what made money. One email when there is something worth reading.

No spam, never sold. Every email has a one-click unsubscribe.

Popular in the shop

All 124 tools →

Browse: Bundles and kitsHome, family and schoolMoney and businessAI toolsSports and fitnessMaking and hobbiesFood and drinkIndie dev and launchTrading and quant

Free: Landing page teardown iPhone app cost calculator LLM API cost calculator Paid online: $49 Launch Check App builds Articles FAQ