Rust advisories / hickory-proto
Vulnerability HighRUSTSEC-2026-0118 · hickory-proto
RUSTSEC-2026-0118: NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses
Short answerA security vulnerability in the hickory-proto crate: NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation enters unbounded loop on cross-zone responses. GitHub rates it High. Fixed in 0.26.0-beta.1: update to a fixed version.
| Crate | hickory-proto |
|---|---|
| Type | Vulnerability (denial-of-service) |
| Affected versions | From 0.25.0-alpha.3 before 0.26.0-beta.1. |
| Fixed in | 0.26.0-beta.1 |
| Severity | High (GitHub rating) |
| Published | 2026-05-01 |
| Last changed | 2026-10-12 |
| Also known as | GHSA-3v94-mw7p-v465, RUSTSEC-2026-0120 |
What to do
- See which version you have:
cargo tree -i hickory-proto(it also shows which of your dependencies pulls it in). - Update within your version requirement:
cargo update -p hickory-proto. If the fix is a newer major or minor than your requirement allows, raise it in Cargo.toml (for examplehickory-proto = "0.26.0-beta.1") or update the dependency that pulls it in. - Check again with
cargo audit, or paste your Cargo.lock into our Cargo.toml checker.
Details from the advisory
The NSEC3 closest-encloser proof validation in hickory-proto's DnssecDnsHandle walks from the QNAME up to the SOA owner name, building a list of candidate encloser names. The iterator used assumes the QNAME is a descendant of the SOA owner, terminating only when the current candidate equals the SOA name. When the SOA in a response's authority section is not an ancestor of the QNAME, the loop stalls at the DNS root and never terminates, repeatedly calling Name::base_name() and pushing newly allocated Name and hashed-name entries into the candidate Vec.
The bug is reachable by any caller of DnssecDnsHandle , including the resolver, recursor, and client , when built with the dnssec-ring or dnssec-aws-lc-rs feature and configured to perform DNSSEC validation. It is triggered while validating a NoData or NXDomain response whose authority section contains an SOA record from a zone other than an ancestor of the QNAME, on a code path that requires NSEC3 closest-encloser proof. In practice this can be reached through an insecure CNAME chain that crosses zone boundaries into a DNSSEC-signed zone returning NoData, but the minimum condition is just a mismatched SOA owner on a response requiring NSEC3 validation.
A debug_assert_ne!(name, Name::root()) guards the loop body, so debug builds abort with a panic on the first iteration past the root. Release builds compile the assertion out and run the loop unbounded, allocating until the process exhausts available memory (OOM). A reachable upstream attacker who can return such a response can therefore crash a debug-built validator or exhaust memory on a release-built one.
The affected code was migrated from hickory-proto to hickory-net as part of the 0.26.0 release. The hickory-proto 0.26.x release no longer offers DnssecDnsHandle and so we recommend all affected users update to hickory-net 0.26.1 when the implementation of that type is required.
References
- Package: crates.io/crates/hickory-proto
- Advisory: rustsec.org/advisories/RUSTSEC-2026-0118.html
- Web: github.com/hickory-dns/hickory-dns/pull/3597
From the RustSec Advisory Database (CC0-1.0) via the OSV export, downloaded Oct 24, 2026. Severity score computed from the published CVSS vector.
Other advisories for hickory-proto
- VulnerabilityRUSTSEC-2025-0006 · 2025-02-07Hickory DNS failure to verify self-signed RRSIG for DNSKEYs
- VulnerabilityRUSTSEC-2026-0119 · 2026-05-01CPU exhaustion during message encoding due to O(n²) name compression
- VulnerabilityGHSA-37wc-h8xc-5hc4 · 2025-02-10Hickory DNS's DNSSEC validation may accept broken authentication chains
Up next
Same cratehickory-proto: security historyEvery advisory for this crate, and whether it is safe to use today.Read it next →Did this answer your question?